A study of science as a social practice it’s a concept she came to borrow from the 20th century American sociologist Robert Merton, who founded the sociology of science. (Merton coined terms that are influential as “self-fulfilling prophecy,” “role model,” and “unintended consequences.”) Many influential to Elbakyan had been Merton’s “norms,” which had been just exactly what he regarded as being the defining faculties of technology: universalism, disinterestedness, arranged doubt, and, needless to say, communism. (Throughout our meeting, she’s nevertheless quick to rattle down quotes from Merton, declaring, “The communism for the medical ethos is incompatible using the concept of technology as ‘private home’ in an economy.” that is capitalistic
Elbakyan’s scientific communism mirrors the Western association between democracy and information openness. ( just just just Take the commonly used American expression “the democratization of… ”) Her intellectual convictions informed the growing vehemence with which Elbakyan insisted that positively unfettered access had been the actual only real acceptable standard of access people must have to discoveries. Fundamentally, she concluded that in a day and time where researchers can publish their research “directly on the web,” or through paywall-free Open Access journals, old-fashioned publishers will inevitably diminish into obsolescence.